search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TEN TRANSFORMATIVE TRENDS 2020 ACOs on the Edge T


here couldn’t possibly be a more fragile or complex moment for the nation’s accountable care organiza- tions (ACOs), which were already being buffeted by winds of policy and payment change—particularly those participating in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) and Next Generation (NextGen) ACO Program, sponsored by the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). As early as last autumn, leading health-


care associations, including the Washing- ton, D.C.-based National Association of ACOs, or NAACOS, and the Charlotte- based Premier Inc. alliance, were call- ing for CMS to modify its benchmark standards for clinical performance for providers under the MSSP, arguing that CMS’s existing benchmarks were mak- ing it extremely difficult for providers in rural, underserved, and other problem


“We were disappointed to see there will be no applica- tion period in 2021 for new ACOs and hope CMS will be open to a partial 2021 perfor- mance year as the healthcare industry stabilizes. NAACOS remains concerned about the uncertainty of the length of the public health emergency and believes COVID-related costs should be removed from the entire performance year.” -- Clif Gaus, Sc.D.


areas to participate in the MSSP (let alone NextGen). Indeed, the tension between CMS on


the one hand and numerous provider associations involved in ACO develop- ment on the other hand, had already approached a breaking point prior to the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic this spring, with the leaders of NAACOS


6


COVID-19 has had a devastating impact on the quality-based payment shift, and


leaders ponder the cloudy future ahead By Mark Hagland


in particular essentially threatening a mass walkout on MSSP if CMS Admin- istrator Seema Verma held firm to her position that ACOs must move quickly and inexorably into downside risk. And then along came the COVID-19 pandemic, which has wreaked havoc on provider organizations. On the hospital side, most hospitals around the country quickly canceled or postponed most elective procedures following a March 18 CMS recommendation, meaning that the total hip and total knee replacements, whose reimbursement had been keeping them afloat in a landscape of already- narrowing reimbursement, were now off the table. On April 19, CMS issued a first set of guidelines around reopening hospitals to elective surgeries, involv- ing a multi-step, criteria-driven process, which presumably would take a fairly long period of time to evolve forward in many states.


But that step proved to be insufficient in this context, as hospitals and physi- cian groups continued to hemorrhage cash through the spring. Indeed, the Chicago-based Kaufman Hall consulting firm produced a “National Hospital Flash Report” in late April, based on March data, showing that hospitals’ median operating EBITDA [earnings before inter- est, taxes, depreciation, and amortization] margins had fallen more than 100 percent in March, dropping a full 13 percentage points relative to last year, or a drop of 1,326 basis points in average operating EBITDA between March 2019 and March 2020, a shift that, as the firm noted, “dem- onstrates that over 90 percent of organi- zations had a negative shift in margin, resulting 75 percent of hospitals having an unsustainable operating margin.” Or, as Kaufman Hall managing partner Jim Blake put it, among U.S. hospitals right now, “The ones who can sustain them- selves are a very small percentage.” And it is in that context that CMS’s


Verma announced a dramatic change in policy on April 30. The agency stated on that date that, “Because the impact of the pandemic varies across the country, CMS is making adjustments to the financial methodology to account for COVID-19 costs so that ACOs will be treated equi- tably regardless of the extent to which


hcinnovationgroup.com | MAY/JUNE 2020


TEN


TRANSFORMATIVE TRENDS


2020


their patient populations are affected by the pandemic. CMS is also forgoing the annual application cycle for 2021 and giving ACOs whose participation is set to end this year the option to extend for another year. ACOs that are required to increase their financial risk over the course of their current agreement period in the program will have the option to maintain their current risk level for next year, instead of being advanced automati- cally to the next risk level.” On that same day, NAACOS issued a statement attributed to its president and CEO, Clif Gaus, Sc.D., in which the asso- ciation said that “NAACOS thanks Seema Verma and her staff for their hard work to address the COVID-19 pandemic’s effect on ACOs and for listening to our concerns. CMS addressed many of the issues NAACOS raised in March when this pandemic first hit hard, and the rule is a fair way to handle ACO performance during a global public health pandemic. We’re appreciative of the thoughtful ways CMS will modify the Shared Savings Program during the public health emer- gency, especially by removing spending associated with COVID-19 patients from performance calculations. NAACOS and others asked for this change last month. CMS’s extending its mitigation of shared losses back to January 2020 and providing flexibility for ACOs to stay in their same risk track next year will help sustain par- ticipation in the program for 2020.” Yet even while thanking Verma for that move, NAACOS stated that “[W]e were disappointed to see there will be no application period in 2021 for new ACOs and hope CMS will be open to a partial 2021 performance year as the healthcare industry stabilizes. NAACOS remains concerned about the uncertainty of the length of the public health emergency


continued on page 8


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32